<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printing Images: Regular Paper vs. Coated Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makepapereasy.com/blog/printing-images-regular-paper-vs-coated-paper/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makepapereasy.com/blog/printing-images-regular-paper-vs-coated-paper</link>
	<description>www.MakePaperEasy.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beatyneils</title>
		<link>http://www.makepapereasy.com/blog/printing-images-regular-paper-vs-coated-paper/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>beatyneils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectcenter.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/printing-images-regular-paper-vs-coated-paper/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>i agree that regular paper paper is not suitable for high quality images, therfore the role of coated paper comes here, but while selecting a coated paper we should keep in mind that it is of high quality &lt;a href=&quot;http://freephotopaper.com/ink_store.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;photo paper&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that regular paper paper is not suitable for high quality images, therfore the role of coated paper comes here, but while selecting a coated paper we should keep in mind that it is of high quality <a href="http://freephotopaper.com/ink_store.htm" rel="nofollow">photo paper</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
